Back
Untitled Document
BOOM-BOOM
The 4th Bishkek Contemporary Art Exhibition
Exhibition dates: 23 September - 7 October 2008
Opening date: 23 September
Workshop: 14-22 September
Conference: 24-26 September
Venues: Kyrgyz National Museum of Fine Arts, Underground Spaces below Central
Square, other venues in open sites
Curators of the project: Ulan Djaparov, Muratbek Djumaliev, Gulnara Kasmalieva
Organizers and coordinators: Muratbek Djumaliev, Gulnara Kasmalieva, "Art-East"
Mira ave 32-3, Bishkek 720044
Kyrgyzstan
tel/fax: +996 312 494537
email: mjumali@yandex.ru
http://arteast.ktnet.kg
Exhibition with participation of artists, architects and designers of the countries
of Central Asia (Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan)
and Caucasus, Russia, China, Europe.
The main components of the project:
1. Simultaneous artistic project: the Cascoland project (Netherlands) with
participation of Dutch artists and designers;
2. International conference with participation of international artists, art-critics,
theorists of architecture.
3. Workshops with participation of young artists and designers in Bishkek university
(supervisor: Ruben Arevshatyan (Yerevan)
4. Presentations, discussions
Boom-Boom
There is a boom of construction in almost all big cities of Central Asia (and
the former USSR), in spite of general complaints about bad life. Huge amounts
of money are invested, fantastic dividends are collected, great human and material
resources are involved. But it is obvious, that there is a lack of systematic
approach to the problems of cities, lack of professional specialists, deficit
of ideas and just a thoughtful attitude to each concrete situation.
Gradually it is shaped dehumanized environment, a kind of aggressive hyper-text
amidst which we have to live. An individual or a separate person cannot influence
this process or present a worthy antithesis.
The following three approaches are dominating:
Ideologized approach (when the main task is to represent through architecture
the ambitions of the authorities in power);
Absolutely pragmatic approach (when in spite of a concrete context the main
task is to meet egoistic wishes of the national bourgeoisie);
Self-construction (for those who have no money, no opportunities, no good taste).
Search of national identity, which occupied for such a long time the heads
of representatives of "creative intelligentsia", resulted in total
profanation of the idea, i.e. creation of a new semi-official, engaged (by power
- political, economic or criminal power) and anonymous architectural environment.
Probably, the time has come to transfer from the infinite "search"
to the adequate approaches towards the realities, and special sensitivity to
numerous nuances in each concrete situation.
At the institutional level (in policy, economy, and social life) some unwritten
"laws" have been shaped for certain people and formal rules of play
for others. After a revived hope in 1990-s, we have a new stagnation with a
new generation of officials-bureaucrats. Only in local spaces (like culture
and arts) it is possible to "resist", uphold and expand the base for
"rare exclusions" from general rules.
The main question is whether it is possible to turn our many "disadvantages"
(characterizing the current marginal in socio-cultural context situation) into
advantages (relying on the diverse cultural, historical and natural resources);
to turn a few even casual successful creative findings into a certain algorithm,
a sustainable artistic phenomenon having a real impact on the cultural situation
in the region.
It is necessary to transfer from general imitation of "pseudo-national
style" or "high-tech", "neoclassic" (or other high
styles) towards realistic for our region technologies, "grass-root"
resources, potential capacities hidden in our problems themselves; from cloning
and spreading archaicized images and samples towards actualization of each concrete
situation and search of new plastic paradigms.
The implied exhibition project will have two main directions:
" artistic-critical comprehension of the current process of degradation
(or transformation?) of the architectural environment in the countries of Central
Asia (and in other similar regions);
" artistic task in itself: to shake down the habitual thinking, to focus
on artistic re-comprehension of the basic data of archetypes underlying the
creation of both dwelling and urban environments; to try to form precedents
- artifacts relevant to the time, place and concrete situations.
Artists :
Ernst Abdrazakov , Lida Abdul , Yuri Avvakumov , Mger Azatyan , Janar Amankulov , Ruben Arevshatyan , Said Atabekov , Umida Ahmedova and Oleg Karpov , Dmitry Ahunbabaev , Armat Bektasov , Yevgeny Boykov , Nika Breithaupt , Elena and Victor Vorobyevs , Shailo Djekshenbaev , Marjolijn Dijkman , Natalia Dyu , Alexander Feodorov , Emil Guzairov , Shirin Homann - Saadat , Alimjan Jorobaev , Galina Konduchalova and Igor Lihterov , Sergey Kuznetsov , Alexander Lozhkin , Pavel Lozhkin , Ruth Maclennan , Vladimir Martynoff , Irina Maslikova , Erbol Meldibekov , Almagul Menlibaeva , Ruslan Muradov , Gaisha Madanova , Saken Narynov , Ekaterina Nikanorova , Alexander Nikolaev , Nurbossyn Oris, Vitaly Simakov , Georgy Tryakin - Buharov , Sergey Tychina , Alexander U , Yura ( Vyacheslav Useinov ), Jamshed Kholikov , Oksana Shatalova , Andrey Chernov , Jun Yang
Sattelite artistic project Cascoland:
Fiona de Bell, Bert Kramer, Jan Korbes, Bart Majoor, Gitte Nygaard, Roel Schoenmakers (The Netherlands )
Participants of the conference:
Yuri Avvakumov (Russia), Ruben Arevshatyan (Armenia), Gamal Bokonbaev (Kyrgyzstan), Jan Korbes (The Netherlands), Alexander Lozhkin (Russia), Pavel Lozhkin (Russia), Saken Narynov, Gitte Nygaard (The Netherlands), Elena Sorokina (Germany), Oksana Shatalova (Kazakhstan), Roel Schoenmakers (The Netherlands), Anouk de Clercq (Belgium), Jan Kempenaers (Belgium), Alterazioni Video (Italy), Yane Calovsky + Hristina Ivanoska,(Macedonia) , Franck Lebovici (France)